Hands-on: Monoprice’s ultraslim 60ft HDMI cable with Redmere
On the left, Monoprice’s new ultraslim 60ft HDMI cable with Redmere. On the right, Monoprice’s current 50ft cable.
(Credit:
Sarah Tew/CNET)
All HDMI cables may be the same in terms of image quality, but that doesn’t mean they’re physically the same.
In the photo above, the thick cable on the right is Monoprice’s current 50ft cable, while the cable on the left is the upcoming Monoprice 60ft ultraslim cable. The new cable is dramatically thinner than traditional long-run HDMI cables; every editor at CNET that held the two cables was impressed by the difference.
Redmere: Unidirectional, thin, and enables long runs
The difference between the two cables is due to the 60ft cable’s built-in Redmere chipset, which draws a small amount of power from the HDMI source (Blu-ray player, cable box, etc.) and allows less copper to be used in the cable.
The cables are unidirectional; you need to plug the “display” end into your TV.
(Credit:
Sarah Tew/CNET)
The need for that tiny bit of power means that the cables are unidirectional. If you look closely at the connectors, they’re labeled “source” and “display”; if you connect them in the other direction, it won’t work at all. (We tried.)
The difference in thickness certainly looks impressive, but why does thin matter on an HDMI cable that going to live behind your TV stand? Well, thick HDMI cables can be frustrating to work with. They’re relatively inflexible, which is a problem if your TV has side-mounted HDMI ports or you’re trying to snake a cable through your cramped TV stand.
The upcoming slim 60 ft. cable is dramatically thinner than the existing 50 ft. cable.
(Credit:
Sarah Tew/CNET)
The sheer weight of the cables is a problem too, putting unneeded stress on the HDMI ports or even lifting tiny gadgets like the Roku LT into the air. (These issues generally only crop up on long HDMI cables, which are necessarily thicker than short ones.)
The fact that the 60ft cable works at all is impressive, given that the HDMI licensing organization recommends using a repeater if you have a cable run longer than 30 ft.
Monoprice means cheap
Monoprice isn’t the first company to integrate Redmere’s technology into its cables, but (as you might have expected) it’s likely to be the cheapest. Samsung wants $70 for a 9 ft. cable, Vizio wants $90 for a 6 ft. cable and Monster wants $100 for a 9 ft. cable. Monoprice says its 60 ft. cable will cost $72 and a 6 ft. cable will cost $13.23, when they’re released in March. (The 6 ft. cable will be much thinner than the 60ft. cable.)
Those prices are dramatically lower than competitors, but the new cable will also be competing against Monoprice’s already cheap standard cables. The 50 ft. cable Monoprice sent us currently costs $55.28, and a 6 ft. cable costs $3.50. At those prices, Redmere strikes us a good deal for longer cables, which are pretty unmanageable at current thickness, but less so for shorter cables, where ultrathin will just mean a little less bulk in your TV cabinet.
We’ll be using the new 60ft Redmere cable in the CNET Lab during our regular testing, so we’ll have a good idea of how it performs in tougher-than-usual conditions by the time these new cables are available in March.
Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cnet/pRza/~3/PnX03ia0JdM/
Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RipleysStuff/~3/NxSofwHpxXk/